top of page

13-02 Good Character Flaws

Jordan Kantey

Create Complex Antagonists

Good character flaws are key to a believable character. Flawed characters create suspense – we wonder whether their flaws will get the best of them. The imbalances in their natures may create weaknesses that give others the upper hand. Here are tips to create flaws for antagonists or villains (i.e. characters who stand between your main character(s) and their goals):

Good character flaws are key to a believable character. Flawed characters create suspense – we wonder whether their flaws will get the best of them. The imbalances in their natures may create weaknesses that give others the upper hand. Here are tips to create flaws for antagonists or villains (i.e. characters who stand between your main character(s) and their goals):

 

1. Create flaws that explain your bad guys’ goals

Flaws can be what make a character attractive. Yet here we’re focusing on their dangerous aspects.

It’s useful to think of flaws as imbalances – qualities a person has out of healthy proportion. Once things are out of proportion, conflict often results. And conflict makes stories suspenseful and engrossing.

An example of an explanatory flaw: Greed. This might explain why your antagonist loves money so much they deceive and con others to gain more. The scheming Uriah Heep in Charles Dickens’ coming of age epic David Copperfield (1849) fits this description. 

A list of flaws that could explain your antagonist’s goals include:

·        Greed: Excessive desire for more than what a person rationally needs (power, money, food, control, etc.)

·        Jealousy: Envying and wanting what others have

·        Prejudice: Holding unfounded beliefs based on surface details about others, e.g. Race, Nationality, Religion, Gender, Orientation etc.

·        Sadism: Taking pleasure in the pain of others

·        Psychopathy: Suffering from chronic mental disorder with abnormal or violent social behaviour’ (Oxford English Dictionary definition)

These are just some of the character flaws that explain antagonists’ actions and choices.

Flaws aren’t always specific to a single character, either. In a novel like Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale (1985), prejudice is the flaw and society the antagonist. This is because in Atwood’s dystopia, women are reduced to property. Here the flaw – society’s troubling ideas about women – explains why they are kept under discriminatory laws.

Creating flaws that explain characters’ behaviour ensures your villains or antagonists have clear motivations for their behaviour.

 

2. Give villains’ character flaws history too

Often we focus so much on developing believable protagonists we neglect antagonists. This is a classic trope in thrillers, spy movies and other stories about ‘good guys vs bad guys’. Often the hero has a past but the ‘bad guy’ has little backstory. He’s a cardboard villain with an accent who carries an exotic cat. Some genres are, of course, more forgiving of cliches and tropes. Yet a character that has some background is usually more interesting.

Instead, find events in your antagonists’ backstories that explain how they became ‘bad to the bone’. For example, Tolkien uses Sauron’s crushing past defeat in his Lord of the Rings cycle to explain (at least partially) his constant pursuit of power.

After Sauron lost physical form (becoming a terrible eye watching over the land of Mordor), it’s easy to understand why this power-hungry warlord would not be content with his situation.

Past experiences that may underlie antagonists’ flaws and devious actions may include:

·        Trauma: Sometimes people don’t rise above personal trauma (a heartbreak, a defeat, etc.), becoming hateful, bitter or vengeful instead

·        Corruption: Villains might be corrupted by the unprincipled quest for something allied to their own imbalance: Power, riches, pleasure, influence, status, and so on

·        Supernatural phenomena: This is a common cause in the horror genre, of course, where spirit possession and otherworldly reasons for ‘turning bad’ are familiar tropes or motifs

Whatever your antagonists’ motives for conflicting with your main character(s), give them their own origins to make their complete arcs believable, too.

 

3. Use advantages and disadvantages that come with flaws

Villains, like heroes, have certain advantages because of their flaws, along with disadvantages. A ‘fatal flaw’, the Achilles’ heel that brings a ‘bad guy’ down, is something that may play into a hero’s hands.

For example, in many classic thriller and espionage scripts, the villain talks… and talks … buying the main character enough time to pull off a stunning coup.

This is a trope that the watchful viewer (or reader) will likely notice as a device, and thus isn’t the most effective. Why would a ruthless villain stop when they’re close to their goal, after all, to have a long, gloating chat? It seems too foolish.

There are other ‘advantage’ vs ‘disadvantage’ pairings you can use, however. For example:

Antagonist flaw: PsychopathyAdvantage (for villain): FearlessnessDisadvantage (for villain): Unable to form trustworthy connections based on typical human values (e.g. mutual care, empathy). Vulnerable to betrayal by own henchmen or strong opposition from elsewhere due to their violent, unfair or sadistic deeds.

Antagonist flaw: ArroganceAdvantage (for villain): Confident demeanour may help them to control others to do their biddingDisadvantage (for villain): Confidence may become overconfidence – they wrongly believe themselves to be invulnerable and leave weak points in their defences.

As you can see from these two examples, your antagonist’s flaws may help them in some ways, but hinder them in others. Show this double-edged quality and use it to explain how sometimes your antagonists have the upper hand, sometimes your ‘heroes’ or protagonists.

 

4. Use good character flaws to build villains’ story arcs

Once you’ve identified good character flaws for your antagonists, use them to build interesting story arcs.

For example, a school bully who physically or emotionally abuses other characters might do so out of insecurity. Perhaps they have a volatile (or bullying) home situation that they’re acting out at school. If their flaw is insecurity, show what happens once this imbalance is fed.

There’s a story about two wolves fighting that ends with the question, ‘Which one wins?’ The answer is ‘The one you feed.’ When you feed antagonists’ imbalances, how do they respond? If the power-hungry army leader captures one city, how does it embolden him? Could one small win cause another flaw (fear of disloyalty) flare up, bringing further complications in the character’s story arc?

Thinking about antagonists’ flaws and imbalances this way – as dynamic, changing and shifting situations – will help you create the development that makes a story gripping.

 

bottom of page